What to Check Before Signing a Business Contract in California

Alex Nahai • October 3, 2026

A business contract should be reviewed as a system, not as a collection of isolated clauses. A favorable liability cap may exclude the claims most likely to create significant exposure. A termination right may be less valuable if important obligations survive termination. California law can also affect provisions that appear routine in agreements drafted elsewhere.

Before signing a significant business contract, companies should understand both the commercial deal and how the agreement allocates risk if the relationship does not go according to plan.

1. Confirm Exactly What Each Party Is Required to Do

The agreement should clearly identify the products, services, deliverables, deadlines, performance standards and dependencies involved in the transaction. If multiple documents govern the deal—such as a master services agreement, statement of work and purchase order—the contract should establish which document controls when terms conflict.

2. Understand the Entire Payment Structure

The contract price is only one component of the economics. Review invoicing requirements, payment deadlines, deposits, expenses, minimum commitments, price increases, late charges, disputed-invoice procedures, refunds, renewal pricing and obligations that continue after termination.

3. Read the Indemnification Provision Carefully

Indemnification provisions can create exposure far beyond the amount a company expects to earn from a contract. Under California Civil Code section 2778, default rules apply to indemnity agreements unless a contrary intention appears. Those rules can include defense costs and, upon request, a duty to defend proceedings embraced by the indemnity.

In Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc. , the California Supreme Court explained that, unless the agreement provides otherwise, the statutory duty to defend can arise upon a proper tender before the underlying litigation determines whether indemnity is ultimately owed.

Review what triggers indemnification, whether it covers third-party claims or direct claims, who controls the defense and settlement, whether intellectual-property claims are covered, and whether indemnification is subject to the agreement's limitation of liability.

4. Determine What the Limitation of Liability Actually Limits

A liability cap should not be evaluated solely by its dollar amount. Determine which claims are capped, which are carved out, whether consequential or lost-profit damages are excluded, whether the provision is mutual, and whether indemnification, confidentiality, data-security or intellectual-property claims receive different treatment.

California Civil Code section 1668 restricts contractual efforts to exempt a party from responsibility for specified misconduct. In New England Country Foods, LLC v. VanLaw Food Products, Inc. (2025), the California Supreme Court held that section 1668 invalidates limitations on damages for willful injury to the person or property of another. The Court also made clear, however, that section 1668 does not prevent parties from limiting liability for a pure breach of contract absent a violation of an independent duty within the statute's scope.

5. Check Termination and Automatic Renewal Provisions

Review the initial term, renewal periods, notice deadlines, termination for cause, cure periods, termination for convenience, early-termination charges, post-termination obligations and provisions that survive. A contract may technically permit termination while making it commercially expensive.

6. Identify Any Personal Guaranty

Business owners should determine whether they are signing solely on behalf of an entity or also assuming personal obligations, particularly in leases, financing and credit arrangements. Review separate guaranties, exhibits and signature blocks—not just the main body of the agreement.

7. Review Intellectual Property Ownership

Contracts involving software, content, designs, inventions, technology or branding should distinguish pre-existing intellectual property from material created during the engagement and should address ownership, assignments, licenses and post-termination rights expressly where appropriate.

8. Examine Confidentiality, Data and Security Obligations

Review what information is protected, permitted uses and disclosures, security requirements, exclusions, return or destruction requirements and duration. If the relationship involves personal information, customer data or regulated information, a generic confidentiality clause may not be enough.

9. Check Assignment and Change-of-Control Restrictions

Ask whether either party may assign without consent, whether assignments to affiliates are permitted, whether assignment is allowed in connection with a merger or sale, whether a change of control is treated as an assignment, and whether consent may be withheld in the other party's discretion.

10. Do Not Ignore Attorneys' Fees

Under California Civil Code section 1717, when a contract provides for attorneys' fees to enforce the contract, the prevailing party in an action on the contract may be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees even if that party was not the party expressly identified in the provision, subject to the statute's requirements. A seemingly one-sided fee clause therefore may not operate that way in California contract litigation.

11. Review Liquidated Damages and Similar Charges

California Civil Code section 1671 addresses contractual liquidated-damages provisions. For many non-consumer commercial contracts, a liquidated-damages provision is generally valid unless the party seeking to invalidate it establishes that it was unreasonable under the circumstances existing when the contract was made, subject to the statute's exceptions and other applicable law.

12. Read the Dispute-Resolution Provisions Before There Is a Dispute

Determine which law governs, where litigation may be filed, whether arbitration or mediation is required, which procedural rules apply, and how fees and costs are allocated.

California presents an important trap for forms borrowed from other jurisdictions. In Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior Court , the California Supreme Court held that predispute contractual jury-trial waivers are not enforceable in California judicial proceedings under the state's existing statutory framework. Businesses using out-of-state forms should not assume a jury-waiver clause will operate in California as it might elsewhere.

13. Consider Restrictive Covenants

California Business and Professions Code section 16600 broadly restricts contractual restraints on lawful professions, trades and businesses, subject to statutory exceptions. The analysis depends heavily on context. Employee noncompetition restrictions are subject to particularly stringent California rules, while the California Supreme Court held in Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc. that a rule-of-reason standard applies to a contractual restraint by which one business is restrained from engaging in a lawful trade or business with another business. Sale-of-business transactions also have statutory exceptions. Restrictive language should therefore be reviewed in the context in which it will operate rather than copied from a form used elsewhere.

14. Read the Contract as a Whole

California Civil Code section 1641 provides that a contract should be considered as a whole so its provisions can be given effect together where reasonably practicable.

Consider an agreement containing a $100,000 liability cap, an indemnification obligation, a carveout excluding indemnification from the cap, and a duty to defend. If a covered third-party intellectual-property claim is tendered, defense obligations may arise before liability is finally determined and may sit outside the $100,000 headline cap. The practical exposure can therefore be many multiples of the number a reader sees in the limitation-of-liability section.

This interaction among provisions is one reason legal contract review should focus on the agreement as a whole rather than merely searching for obviously unfavorable language.

15. Ask What Happens If the Business Changes

Before signing a long-term agreement, consider future financing, acquisitions, a sale of the company, restructuring, expansion and changes in technology or intellectual-property use. Assignment restrictions, exclusivity provisions, minimum commitments, intellectual-property rights and change-of-control clauses can affect later transactions.

Before Signing a Significant Business Contract

There is no universal checklist that makes every agreement safe to sign. The importance of a provision depends on the economics of the transaction, the parties' leverage, the type of agreement and the consequences if the relationship fails.

Alex Nahai advises California businesses regarding the drafting, review and negotiation of commercial agreements and business transactions. Depending on the engagement, review may include identifying material legal and business issues, preparing or reviewing proposed revisions and redlines, and assisting with negotiations concerning significant contract terms.

For a material commercial agreement, have the agreement reviewed before you sign, while there is still an opportunity to negotiate the allocation of risk.

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of California law depends on the particular agreement, transaction and circumstances. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Two business owners facing each other during a tense discussion about an ownership dispute.
By Alex Nahai • October 15, 2026
When business owners reach an impasse, the company can quickly become collateral damage. Explore buyouts, mediation, litigation, and other legal options for moving forward.
Business team reviewing growth and investment opportunities.
By Alex Nahai • October 13, 2026
A polished pitch deck can earn you a meeting. It cannot fix a messy cap table, questionable IP ownership, outdated corporate records, or a contract that gives someone else the power to disrupt your plans. Before investors decide whether they believe in where your business is going, they will want to understand what they are actually investing in today. That makes legal and organizational preparation part of fundraising strategy, not an administrative chore to handle after the first term sheet arrives. In 2026, with investors continuing to scrutinize deal structures and company fundamentals, being prepared can make the difference between answering diligence questions confidently and scrambling to explain avoidable problems. Start With the Cap Table Few documents tell an investor more about a company than its capitalization table. It should make ownership easy to understand, not require a detective novel and three spreadsheets to interpret. Before approaching investors, founders should confirm that the cap table matches the underlying legal documents and accurately accounts for: · Founder ownership · Common and preferred equity · Stock options · SAFEs and convertible notes · Warrants · Other promised or outstanding equity · Previous financing transactions The SEC specifically advises companies considering later-stage capital to examine dilution, existing investor rights, anti-dilution provisions, and employee equity plans before raising additional funds. An inaccurate cap table can create more than an awkward conversation. It can complicate negotiations, affect valuation, and force a company to clean up historical issues while an investor is already looking closely. The investor's basic question is simple: If I invest today, exactly what am I buying? Your company should have a simple answer. Make Corporate Governance Investor-Ready Investors are not only evaluating the company's products and financial potential. They are also evaluating whether the company is organized well enough to handle investment. Review the Corporate Foundation Check formation documents, bylaws or operating agreements, board records, shareholder or member approvals, officer appointments, previous equity issuances, and major corporate transactions. Governance does not need to mean building a corporate machine worthy of a Fortune 500 company. It means having processes appropriate for the company's size and stage. For founders preparing for institutional investment, unresolved governance questions can become particularly uncomfortable when an investor asks whether a previous transaction was properly authorized or whether someone actually has the ownership interest reflected on the cap table. The goal is straightforward: investors should see a company whose legal structure supports the growth story being presented to them. Make Intellectual Property Ownership Crystal Clear For technology companies, IP may be one of the company's most valuable assets. That makes ownership a particularly important diligence question. Before fundraising, review whether the company has appropriate agreements covering intellectual property created by: · Founders · Employees · Independent contractors · Developers · Designers · Consultants · Strategic partners The company should also know what trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, source code, domains, and third-party licenses it owns or uses. A common problem arises when a contractor creates core technology but the company's agreement does not clearly establish ownership of the resulting work. The business may have been using the asset for years without anyone asking the uncomfortable question of who legally owns it. That question tends to become much less comfortable when an investor asks it. For technology businesses, it is also worth reviewing how third-party AI tools are being used. California continues to develop policies addressing AI, privacy, and responsible technology use , including 2026 initiatives concerning AI safety, privacy, and cybersecurity. If the business relies on AI to create, analyze, or process valuable information, founders should understand the relevant vendor terms, data practices, confidentiality provisions, and ownership rules. Review the Contracts Investors Will Care About
By Alex Nahai • October 12, 2026
Many people assume securities lawyers only become involved when there's an SEC investigation or a lawsuit. In reality, that's often the exception rather than the rule. For founders, investors, and growing companies, a securities lawyer is a strategic advisor who helps navigate the legal side of raising capital, managing investor relationships, and staying compliant as the business evolves. Their role isn't simply to solve problems; it's to help businesses avoid creating them in the first place. Whether you're preparing your first fundraising round or managing an established company with multiple investors, securities counsel plays a vital role throughout the journey. Guiding Businesses Through Capital Raises Raising capital involves far more than presenting a compelling business plan. Every financing round must comply with securities laws, and the way an investment is structured can have lasting legal implications. A securities lawyer helps determine the appropriate exemption, prepares offering documents, reviews investor agreements, and ensures the transaction is conducted in accordance with applicable regulations. For example, if a startup is seeking investment from several accredited investors, legal counsel can help structure the offering correctly while ensuring required disclosures and documentation are in place before funds are accepted. Helping Companies Stay Compliant Compliance isn't a one-time task completed after a financing round closes. It's an ongoing responsibility that evolves as a business grows. A securities lawyer helps companies: · Review corporate governance practices · Maintain accurate ownership and equity records · Advise on disclosure obligations · Monitor regulatory requirements · Develop policies that reduce legal and operational risk Strong compliance practices not only reduce legal exposure but also demonstrate professionalism to investors, lenders, and future acquirers. Supporting Private Placements and Investor Communications Private offerings require careful planning and clear communication. Investors expect accurate information about the opportunity, associated risks, governance structure, and how their investment will be managed. Securities lawyers review offering materials, subscription agreements, and investor communications to ensure they are legally sound and consistent. Clear documentation doesn't simply satisfy legal requirements. It also builds confidence by establishing realistic expectations from the outset. Managing Investor Relationships Before Problems Arise
By Alex Nahai • October 11, 2026
LA Commercial Real Estate Lawyer For Businesses | Alex Nahai Law
By Alex Nahai • October 11, 2026
Securities Dispute Counsel In Los Angeles
By Alex Nahai • October 10, 2026
Learn when Form D is due for Regulation D offerings, what it reports, when amendments may be needed, and why state notice filings still matter.
By Alex Nahai • October 10, 2026
Compare 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) private funds, including investor limits, qualified purchasers, offering structure, and adviser-registration considerations.
By Alex Nahai • October 10, 2026
A sponsor-focused guide to subscription agreements, investor eligibility, disclosures, fund governing documents and private offering closing controls.
By Alex Nahai • October 10, 2026
Key contract provisions for businesses buying software services: data rights, security, service levels, termination and transition assistance.
By Alex Nahai • October 10, 2026
A practical guide to Rule 506(c) accredited investor verification, including reasonable steps, documentation methods, and issuer procedures.